One common thread for many commanders
in both armies during the American Civil War was sewn years earlier when they
served together in the United States Army during the Mexican War.
Ulysses Grant, Robert E. Lee, George
Meade, James Longstreet and Thomas (not yet called ‘Stonewall’) Jackson served
in that conflict. None were generals at that point of their careers, but they
all played one role or another and all on the same side.
The Mexican War does not get the same
study or popular attention as does the
Civil War. Reading some Civil War
studies leads you to believe that Grant and the others mentioned above went
down to Mexico with General Winfield Scott and pretty much handled everything
by themselves.
John Isaac Baird |
They didn’t, of course. There were
lots of common soldiers involved in the fighting. Otherwise, the officers would
have nobody to order around.
One of the common soldiers in the army
at that time was a Private named John Isaac Baird. Baird served in Cunningham’s
Alabama Regiment in Mexico, mustering in on June 29, 1846.
Baird
put his experience to work later when he enlisted in the Confederate Army in
early July, 1862 as a 2nd Lieutenant in the Cavalry Battalion of
Hilliard’s Legion. The Cavalry Battalion, the Legion’s 5th, was
split off from the Legion very soon after it was founded to become part of the
10th Confederate Cavalry.
Ironically,
the 10th was part of the Confederate Army of Tennessee, as was the
Legion, by the fall of 1863. Serving in the brigade commanded by Brig. General
Archibald Gracie, the Legion won fame during the bloody Battle of Chickamauga.
The 10th also fought valiantly in that battle.
Baird,
however, was not at Chickamauga. He was promoted to Captain on April 15, 1863
but resigned due to physical disability on July 22 of the same year, a little
less than two months before the clash at Chickamauga.
He
became the Sheriff of Clay County, Alabama in 1867.
The
information about Baird came from a great-great grandson of Baird’s, Monte
Rogers, who also allowed this blog to use the image of Baird that you see here.
Nice guy.
The
point here is that battlefield histories must concentrate on officers, usually
high-ranking officers, in order to explain decisions and actions that take
place during battles. Regiments are identified by their commanders and so
forth. But for every commander mentioned there are hundreds or thousands of
common soldiers who carry out those decisions and determine whether the actions
are successful.
We
must never forget the courage of the common soldiers, then or now.
Thanks for reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment