Monument to the 20th Maine at Little Round Top. |
The
idea behind the topic of this issue of Speedyleeway is to spark debate. Your
loyal blogger has an opinion on the question to be introduced and that opinion
will be posted at a later date.
There
is no right and wrong here, only questions and opinions. Readers with opinions
already formed are encouraged to render said opinions. Readers new to the
question are urged to consider the background notes and then render your
thoughts. Thoughts and opinions are welcome, so long as they are written politely.
Political correctness is less important than plain, old fashioned good manners.
Below
is the background for the question, the question itself and a short list of
pros and cons.
Background: There is a small
hill near the town of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania named Little Round Top. On July
2, 1863, the second day of the bloodiest battle of the American Civil War, the
Confederate Army of Northern Virginia attacked along a broad front the defenses
of the United States Army of the Potomac. The far left flank of the Union
defense was on Little Round Top.
The
left-most Union regiment, the 20th Maine, endured a determined
effort by the Confederate 15th Alabama regiment to crush the flank
and take the high ground from the Union Army. To be sure, other Confederate
regiments attacked other Union regiments at other locations on Little Round Top
and Confederate regiments from Texas and Alabama actually succeeded in driving off the Union
defenders in front of it. The timely arrival of reinforcements saved the day
for the Union.
For the
purposes of this debate, all that matters is the fighting between the Maine
regiment, commanded by Joshua L. Chamberlain, and the Alabamians led by William
C. Oates.
More
complete information on the struggle is available in numerous books or websites,
but we can sum the action up by saying the Confederates pressed the Maine
defenders hard and failed to move Chamberlain’s men off the ground they
defended.
Chamberlain
went on to make a career out of being the man who led the defense of the left flank
at Gettysburg and eventually became the governor of Maine. Oates, a lawyer
before the war, returned to the legal profession when the war ended but later
went into politics and was elected the governor of Alabama.
There
is a memorial to the Maine regiment where those men so fiercely held their
ground. While serving as Alabama’s governor, Oates wrote Governor Chamberlain
of Maine to learn whether Chamberlain would fight against Oates’ desire to
place a monument to his Alabama regiment on Little Round Top. Chamberlain did
not oppose the idea until the old warriors got to discussing the location of
the proposed Alabama memorial.
Oates
wanted to place the monument on the spot where, Oates said, his brother was
killed. Oates described the desired spot to Chamberlain. Chamberlain was
adamant that the Confederates did NOT penetrate the Union lines that far. The
politicians agreed, the old soldiers did not. No monument to the 15th
Alabama was ever erected on Little Round Top.
Roughly 150 years later, your loyal
blogger found two notes next to each other in the 20th Maine area of
Little Round Top. They are pictured here and that brings us to the question.
Marker for position of left flank of the 20th Maine July 2, 1863. |
Question: Should there be a
memorial of some sort to the 15th Alabama somewhere on or near
Little Round Top?
Messages in favor of 15th Alabama monument on Little Round Top. |
Pro: The 20th Maine
area is among the most visited locations of all the Civil War battlefield
parks. Adding a marker for the 15th Alabama would enable better
understanding for the fighting that was done there. Even Chamberlain was not
against the idea, he was in disagreement with Oates over the location where
Oates wanted the proposed marker to go. The politics of history should not
determine the answer to this question.
Con: It is too late now to do so
because little would be served by putting the money or time into the effort.
There are very few positions reached markers at Gettysburg for Confederate
units, though there are a few. We do not know today where Oates wanted to
locate the memorial to his regiment. Today we find the Confederate cause (the
continuation of slavery) repellant, with good reason, and a monument to a
Confederate unit would be the same as blessing the Confederate cause.
Blogger’s answer: Your loyal blogger
feels a position-reached marker or at least a plaque representing the pathway
the 15th Alabama followed should have been erected decades ago, if
for no other reason than to more clearly detail the history of the location.
There are left and right flank markers for the Union regiments that indicate
where the defenders were on Little Round Top but there are no indications of
where each attacking Confederate regiment went up against those defenders.
Given the popularity Little Round Top
has among Gettysburg visitors (new and old), you would have expected that there
would be more attention to detail about where each Confed regiment was. Look at
it this way: Those Union regiments were fighting somebody. Why not delineate the attacking force?
Having said that, it is certainly easy
to spend someone else’s money. A marker for the 15th Alabama would
cost money. The location would have to be determined, the type of
marker/monument/statue would have to be decided and someone would have to pay
to have the thing created, moved and erected. For this observer, the same thing
would have to be done for the 48th Alabama, 4th Texas, 5th
Texas, 4th Alabama and 47th Alabama because those
regiments also attacked Little Round Top on July 2, 1863.
Right flank marker for the 16th Michigan on LRT. |
The
48th Alabama and 4th Texas succeeded in dislodging the 16th
Michigan from the Union right on Little Round Top. Only the timely arrival of
the 140th New York saved the Union defenders from defeat. Certainly
a position reached marker for those regiments would be in order, similar to the
North Carolina marker pictured here near the wall on Cemetery Ridge.
However
… it is too late now for the work to be done. The history of the location would
be richly served, but historic accuracy has given way to political correctness
in American society. The uproar over placing such markers would be damaging to
the National Parks Service and this blogger cares too much about the good work
the NPS does to risk the backlash that would certainly come.
With
regret, the opinion here is that it will never happen.
No comments:
Post a Comment